Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations

Berthold K, Eysink THS, Renkl A (2009)
Instructional Science 37(4): 345-363.

Journal Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author
; ;
Abstract
Learning with multiple representations is usually employed in order to foster understanding. However, it also imposes high demands on the learners and often does not lead to the expected results, especially because the learners do not integrate the different representations. Thus, it is necessary to support the learners’ self-explanation activity, which concerns the integration and understanding of multiple representations. In the present experiment, we employed multi-representational worked-out examples and tested the effects of two types of self-explanation prompts as help procedures for integrating and understanding multiple representations. The participants (N = 62) learned about probability theory under three conditions: (a) open self-explanation prompts, (b) self-explanation prompts in an assistance-giving-assistance-withholding procedure (assisting self-explanation prompts), or (c) no prompts (control group). Both types of self-explanation prompts fostered procedural knowledge. This effect was mediated by self-explanations directed to domain principles. Conceptual knowledge was particularly fostered by assisting self-explanation prompts which was mediated by self-explanations on the rationale of a principle. Thus, for enhancing high-quality self-explanations and both procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding, we conclude that assisting self-explanation prompts should be provided. We call this the assisting self-explanation prompt effect which refers to the elicitation of high-quality self-explanations and the acquisition of deep understanding.
Publishing Year
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Berthold K, Eysink THS, Renkl A. Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science. 2009;37(4):345-363.
Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science, 37(4), 345-363.
Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H. S., and Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science 37, 345-363.
Berthold, K., Eysink, T.H.S., & Renkl, A., 2009. Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science, 37(4), p 345-363.
K. Berthold, T.H.S. Eysink, and A. Renkl, “Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations”, Instructional Science, vol. 37, 2009, pp. 345-363.
Berthold, K., Eysink, T.H.S., Renkl, A.: Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science. 37, 345-363 (2009).
Berthold, Kirsten, Eysink, Tessa H. S., and Renkl, Alexander. “Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations”. Instructional Science 37.4 (2009): 345-363.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Search this title in

Google Scholar