Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us?

Kristensen FB, Gerhardus A (2010)
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 341(oct22 1).

Journal Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author
;
Publishing Year
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Kristensen FB, Gerhardus A. Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. 2010;341(oct22 1).
Kristensen, F. B., & Gerhardus, A. (2010). Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 341(oct22 1).
Kristensen, F. B., and Gerhardus, A. (2010). Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 341.
Kristensen, F.B., & Gerhardus, A., 2010. Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 341(oct22 1).
F.B. Kristensen and A. Gerhardus, “Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us?”, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 341, 2010.
Kristensen, F.B., Gerhardus, A.: Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. 341, (2010).
Kristensen, Finn Borlum, and Gerhardus, Ansgar. “Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us?”. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 341.oct22 1 (2010).
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

4 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Can a Joint Assessment Provide Relevant Information for National/Local Relative Effectiveness Assessments? An In-Depth Comparison of Pazopanib Assessments.
Kleijnen S, Fathallah M, van der Linden MW, Vancraeynest P, Dahmani B, Timoney A, De Boer A, Leufkens HG, Goettsch WG., Value Health 18(5), 2015
PMID: 26297095
Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): four case studies.
Huic M, Nachtnebel A, Zechmeister I, Pasternak I, Wild C., Int J Technol Assess Health Care 29(3), 2013
PMID: 23759333
[Do media reports and public brochures facilitate informed decision making about cervical cancer prevention?].
Neumeyer-Gromen A, Bodemer N, Muller SM, Gigerenzer G., Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 54(11), 2011
PMID: 22015792

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 20971784
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar