Aging and Decision-Making: A Neurocognitive Perspective

Brand M, Markowitsch HJ (2010)
Gerontology 56(3): 319-324.

No fulltext has been uploaded. References only!
Journal Article | Original Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Neuropsychological research contributes to a better understanding of cognitive mechanisms involved in making advantageous decisions, which is important for everyday life. Using laboratory gambling tasks, it has been demonstrated that both structural and functional brain changes can result in disadvantageous decision-making linked to reductions in executive functioning and feedback processing. However, relatively little is known about whether or not decision-making on these tasks is affected by normal aging. We argue that functions involved in decision-making - in particular categorization and monitoring processes - are most likely reduced in older adults. These reductions should lead to decision-making difficulties in older individuals. However, we also argue that the effects of age on decision-making depend on the type of decision situation (i.e. ambiguous or risky) in combination with the complexity of the decision-making task. In addition, we give a brief overview of methodological issues that should be taken into account in future studies on decision-making and aging. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Publishing Year

Cite this

Brand M, Markowitsch HJ. Aging and Decision-Making: A Neurocognitive Perspective. Gerontology. 2010;56(3):319-324.
Brand, M., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2010). Aging and Decision-Making: A Neurocognitive Perspective. Gerontology, 56(3), 319-324. doi:10.1159/000248829
Brand, M., and Markowitsch, H. J. (2010). Aging and Decision-Making: A Neurocognitive Perspective. Gerontology 56, 319-324.
Brand, M., & Markowitsch, H.J., 2010. Aging and Decision-Making: A Neurocognitive Perspective. Gerontology, 56(3), p 319-324.
M. Brand and H.J. Markowitsch, “Aging and Decision-Making: A Neurocognitive Perspective”, Gerontology, vol. 56, 2010, pp. 319-324.
Brand, M., Markowitsch, H.J.: Aging and Decision-Making: A Neurocognitive Perspective. Gerontology. 56, 319-324 (2010).
Brand, Matthias, and Markowitsch, Hans J. “Aging and Decision-Making: A Neurocognitive Perspective”. Gerontology 56.3 (2010): 319-324.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

18 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Phishing suspiciousness in older and younger adults: The role of executive functioning.
Gavett BE, Zhao R, John SE, Bussell CA, Roberts JR, Yue C., PLoS ONE 12(2), 2017
PMID: 28158316
Empathy Mediates the Effects of Age and Sex on Altruistic Moral Decision Making.
Rosen JB, Brand M, Kalbe E., Front Behav Neurosci 10(), 2016
PMID: 27147990
The Effects of Age, Priming, and Working Memory on Decision-Making.
Wood M, Black S, Gilpin A., Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(1), 2016
PMID: 26761023
Decision Making and Ratio Processing in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Pertl MT, Benke T, Zamarian L, Delazer M., J. Alzheimers Dis. 48(3), 2015
PMID: 26402094
Measuring executive function in control subjects and TBI patients with question completion time (QCT).
Woods DL, Yund EW, Wyma JM, Ruff R, Herron TJ., Front Hum Neurosci 9(), 2015
PMID: 26042021
Developmental changes in decision making under risk: The role of executive functions and reasoning abilities in 8- to 19-year-old decision makers.
Schiebener J, Garcia-Arias M, Garcia-Villamisar D, Cabanyes-Truffino J, Brand M., Child Neuropsychol 21(6), 2015
PMID: 25027746
Age Differences in Adaptive Decision Making: The Role of Numeracy.
Chen Y, Wang J, Kirk RM, Pethtel OL, Kiefner AE., Educ Gerontol 40(11), 2014
PMID: 25544800
Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk.
Schiebener J, Wegmann E, Gathmann B, Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Brand M., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25520690
Internet addiction: coping styles, expectancies, and treatment implications.
Brand M, Laier C, Young KS., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25426088
A versatile task for assessing decision-making abilities: the truck dispatcher framework.
Schiebener J, Schulte FP, Hofmann J, Brand M., Appl Neuropsychol Adult 21(4), 2014
PMID: 25265306
Memory, emotion, and age: the work of kinugawa et Al. (2013).
Markowitsch HJ., Front Psychiatry 5(), 2014
PMID: 24904441
Memory and self-neuroscientific landscapes.
Markowitsch HJ., ISRN Neurosci 2013(), 2013
PMID: 24967303
Neuroscientific model of motivational process.
Kim SI., Front Psychol 4(), 2013
PMID: 23459598
Decision making in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.
Zamarian L, Hofler J, Kuchukhidze G, Delazer M, Bonatti E, Kemmler G, Trinka E., J. Neurol. 260(3), 2013
PMID: 23104123
Judgment in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's disease.
Capucho PHFV, Brucki SMD., Dement Neuropsychol 5(4), 2011
PMID: 29213756
Expected value information improves financial risk taking across the adult life span.
Samanez-Larkin GR, Wagner AD, Knutson B., Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 6(2), 2011
PMID: 20501485


0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®


PMID: 19864870
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar