Genetic Determinism and the Innate-Acquired Distinction in Medicine

Kronfeldner M (2009)
Medicine Studies 1(2): 167-181.

Download
OA
Journal Article | Published | English
Abstract
This article illustrates in which sense genetic determinism is still part of the contemporary interactionist consensus in medicine. Three dimensions of this consensus are discussed: kinds of causes, a continuum of traits ranging from monogenetic diseases to car accidents, and different kinds of determination due to different norms of reaction. On this basis, this article explicates in which sense the interactionist consensus presupposes the innate?acquired distinction. After a descriptive Part 1, Part 2 reviews why the innate?acquired distinction is under attack in contemporary philosophy of biology. Three arguments are then presented to provide a limited and pragmatic defense of the distinction: an epistemic, a conceptual, and a historical argument. If interpreted in a certain manner, and if the pragmatic goals of prevention and treatment (ideally specifying what medicine and health care is all about) are taken into account, then the innate?acquired distinction can be a useful epistemic tool. It can help, first, to understand that genetic determination does not mean fatalism, and, second, to maintain a system of checks and balances in the continuing nature?nurture debates.
Publishing Year
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Kronfeldner M. Genetic Determinism and the Innate-Acquired Distinction in Medicine. Medicine Studies. 2009;1(2):167-181.
Kronfeldner, M. (2009). Genetic Determinism and the Innate-Acquired Distinction in Medicine. Medicine Studies, 1(2), 167-181.
Kronfeldner, M. (2009). Genetic Determinism and the Innate-Acquired Distinction in Medicine. Medicine Studies 1, 167-181.
Kronfeldner, M., 2009. Genetic Determinism and the Innate-Acquired Distinction in Medicine. Medicine Studies, 1(2), p 167-181.
M. Kronfeldner, “Genetic Determinism and the Innate-Acquired Distinction in Medicine”, Medicine Studies, vol. 1, 2009, pp. 167-181.
Kronfeldner, M.: Genetic Determinism and the Innate-Acquired Distinction in Medicine. Medicine Studies. 1, 167-181 (2009).
Kronfeldner, Maria. “Genetic Determinism and the Innate-Acquired Distinction in Medicine”. Medicine Studies 1.2 (2009): 167-181.
Main File(s)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Last Uploaded
2016-02-08T13:42:55Z

This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

40 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Constitutional and hereditary disorders
Olby RobertC., 1993

Oyama Susan., 1985

Oyama Susan., 2000
Terms in tension: What do you do when all the good words are taken?
Oyama Susan., 2001

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2001
Behavior: Its nature and nurture
Schaffner KennethF., 2006

Skinner BurrhusF., 1948

Skyrms Brian., 2000
The idea of innateness
Stich StephenP., 1975
Apportioning causal responsibility
Sober Elliott., 1988
Innateness as an explanatory concept
Wendler Dave., 1996
Developmental constraints, generative entrenchment and the innate–acquired distinction
Wimsatt William., 1986
Generative entrenchment, evolution, and innateness: Philosophy, evolutionary biology, and conceptual foundations of science
Wimsatt William., 1999
Causes that make a difference
Waters KennethC., 2007
Identical mutations and phenotypic variation.
Wolf U., Hum. Genet. 100(3-4), 1997
PMID: 9272148

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Sources

PMID: 20234831
PubMed | Europe PMC

PhilLister: 601

Search this title in

Google Scholar