Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators

Liesenjohann T, Eccard JA (2008)
BMC Ecology 8(1).

Journal Article | Published | English
BACKGROUND: Many animals live in environments where different types of predators pose a permanent threat and call for predator specific strategies. When foraging, animals have to balance the competing needs of food and safety in order to survive. While animals sometimes can choose between microhabitats that differ in their risk of predation, many habitats are uniform in their risk distribution. So far, little is known about adaptive antipredator behavior under uniform risk. We simulated two predator types, avian and mammalian, each representing a spatially uniform risk in the artificial resource landscapes. Voles served as experimental foragers. RESULTS: Animals were exposed to factorial combinations of weasel odour and ground cover to simulate avian and/or mammalian predation. We measured short and long term responses with video analysis and giving-up densities. The results show that previously experienced conditions cause delayed effects. After these effects ceased, the risks of both types of predation caused a reduction in food intake. Avian predation induced a concentration on a smaller number of feeding patches. While higher avian risk caused a delay in activity, the weasel odour shortened the latency until the voles started to be active. CONCLUSION: We show that the voles differed in risk types and adjusted their feeding strategies accordingly. Responses to avian and mammalian risk differed both in strength and time scales. Uniformity of risk resulted in a concentration of foraging investment and lower foraging efficiency.
Publishing Year

Cite this

Liesenjohann T, Eccard JA. Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators. BMC Ecology. 2008;8(1).
Liesenjohann, T., & Eccard, J. A. (2008). Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators. BMC Ecology, 8(1).
Liesenjohann, T., and Eccard, J. A. (2008). Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators. BMC Ecology 8.
Liesenjohann, T., & Eccard, J.A., 2008. Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators. BMC Ecology, 8(1).
T. Liesenjohann and J.A. Eccard, “Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators”, BMC Ecology, vol. 8, 2008.
Liesenjohann, T., Eccard, J.A.: Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators. BMC Ecology. 8, (2008).
Liesenjohann, T., and Eccard, J. A. “Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators”. BMC Ecology 8.1 (2008).
Main File(s)
File Name
Access Level
OA Open Access

This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

3 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

State-dependent foraging: lactating voles adjust their foraging behavior according to the presence of a potential nest predator and season.
Liesenjohann T, Liesenjohann M, Trebaticka L, Sundell J, Haapakoski M, Ylonen H, Eccard JA., Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. (Print) 69(5), 2015
PMID: 25926712
Thinking evolutionarily about obesity.
Genne-Bacon EA., Yale J Biol Med 87(2), 2014
PMID: 24910556

44 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Effect of odor of weasels () on trapped samples of their prey
Stoddart D., 1976
The effects of weasel proximity on the foraging activity of voles
Koivisto E, Pusenius J., 2006
Amphibian Metamorphosis – growth-rate, predation risk, and the optimal size at transformation
Werner E., 1986
Use of middens by red foxes: risk reverses rhythms of rats
Fenn MGP, Macdonald DW., 1995
The scent of death: Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals
Kats L, Dill L., 1998
Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities
Kotler B., 1984
Integrative approaches to the study of predation – general thoughts and a case-study on sunfish and salamander larvae
Sih A., 1992
Foraging decisions in risk-uniform landscapes.
Eccard JA, Liesenjohann T., PLoS ONE 3(10), 2008
PMID: 18927615
Patch use under predation risk: I. Models and predictions
Brown JS., 1992
Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment: When are the risky and safe patches of equal value?
Kotler B, Blaustein L., 1995
Small rodent food, feeding and population dynamics – comparison between granivorous and herbivorous species in Scandinavia
Hansson L., 1971
Bayes' theorem and its applications in animal behaviour
McNamara J, Green R, Olsson O., 2006
The survival-rate-maximizing policy for Bayesian foragers: wait for good news
Olsson O, Holmgren N., 1998
The effects of habitat manipulation on population distribution and foraging behavior in meadow voles
Pusenius J, Schmidt KA., 2002
Does risk of predation by mammalian predators affect the spacing behaviour of rodents? Two large-scale experiments
Jonsson P, Koskela E, Mappes T., 2000
Experimental analysis of behaviour of meadow voles () to odours of the short-tailed weasel ()
Parsons G, Bondrup-Nielsen S., 1996
Heritable and experiential effects on boldness in a tropical poeciliid
Brown C, Burgess F, Braithwaite V., 2007
Life in a multipredator environment – some considerations for antipredatory vigilance
Lima S., 1992
Impact of behavior on central and peripheral circadian clocks in the common vole Microtus arvalis, a mammal with ultradian rhythms.
van der Veen DR, Minh NL, Gos P, Arneric M, Gerkema MP, Schibler U., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(9), 2006
PMID: 16481616


0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB


PMID: 19068146
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar