A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTS PROPOSED TO MEASURE THE BIG-5

Ostendorf F, Angleitner A (1994)
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE 44(1): 45-53.

Journal Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Abstract
We compared three questionnaires assumed to measure different versions of five basic or Big Five factors of personality: The revised form of the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R), developed by COSTA and McCRAE (1992) within the framework of the conventional Big Five factor model (GOLDBERG, 1990); the Zuckerman Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ-III; ZUCKERMAN, KUHLMAN, TETA, JOIREMAN & CARROCCIA, 1992) measuring five basic temperament factors assumed to have significant biological correlates and genetic influence; and the Professional Personality Questionnaire (PPQ; KLINE & LAPHAM, 1990) designed to measure the Big Five, as described by COSTA and McCRAE, in occupational settings. Factors derived from a set of 179 adjective rating scales were used as a standard of comparison representing the Big Five in the tradition of the lexical approach to personality. A principal component analysis of the questionnaire scales and rating factors revealed rive components that were most clearly defined by the NEO-PI-R domain scales and the adjective rating factors.
Publishing Year
ISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Ostendorf F, Angleitner A. A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTS PROPOSED TO MEASURE THE BIG-5. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE. 1994;44(1):45-53.
Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (1994). A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTS PROPOSED TO MEASURE THE BIG-5. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 44(1), 45-53.
Ostendorf, F., and Angleitner, A. (1994). A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTS PROPOSED TO MEASURE THE BIG-5. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE 44, 45-53.
Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A., 1994. A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTS PROPOSED TO MEASURE THE BIG-5. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 44(1), p 45-53.
F. Ostendorf and A. Angleitner, “A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTS PROPOSED TO MEASURE THE BIG-5”, EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, vol. 44, 1994, pp. 45-53.
Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A.: A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTS PROPOSED TO MEASURE THE BIG-5. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE. 44, 45-53 (1994).
Ostendorf, Fritz, and Angleitner, Alois. “A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTS PROPOSED TO MEASURE THE BIG-5”. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE 44.1 (1994): 45-53.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Search this title in

Google Scholar