Wikelski, M ; Carrillo, V ; Trillmich, FritzUniBi
Abstract / Notes
Galapagos marine iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus) populations show considerable differences in body size. Adult body mass varies by more than 10-fold, and body length (snout-vent length, SVL) varies by approximate to 2.2-fold. Predation and interspecific food competition are largely absent and can be excluded as potential forces explaining differences in body size among populations. This provides an ideal system in which to determine how proximate environmental factors affect adult body size, We compared the small iguanas from Genovesa Island (mean adult male SVL 250 mm) to the larger Santa Fe iguanas (mean adult male SVL 400 mm). Marine iguanas forage on intertidal algae pastures in scramble competition. Energy availability was lower on Genovesa than on Santa Fe, because of lower marine productivity on Genovesa. The length of grazable algal turf decreased with increasing sea surface temperature (SST). SST was approximate to 2 degrees C lower on Santa Fe than on Genovesa, implying approximate to 1.5 mm lower algae pastures on the latter. Genovesa showed a fivefold lower standing algal biomass and a twofold lower productivity of algae pastures than did Santa Fe. The smallest iguanas of each island had approximate to 1.5-fold higher bite rates during foraging, and their absolute food intake per day was 35% that of the largest iguanas. However, food intake per bite per gram of body mass was about twice as high for small iguanas as for large iguanas. Large iguanas of both islands showed a marked decline in body mass during the two study years, whereas small iguanas (SVL < 170 mm on Genovesa and < 320 mm on Santa Fe) increased in mass, Growth rates of SVL reflected these findings. A comparison of measured metabolizable energy with published field metabolic rates (FMR) suggested that iguanas above a threshold size were in negative energy balance, because energy intake scaled to body mass with a lower exponent (0.3) than FMR (0.97). Threshold body size was lower on Genovesa than on Santa Fe and differed between years: In the lean El Nino year (1991/1992), iguanas > 200 mm SVL on Genovesa and > 310 mm SVL on Santa Fe significantly lost mass; in the more productive year (1992/1993), thresholds were 230 mm and 350 mm SVL, respectively. Thus, food abundance (length and turnover of algal swards) explained differences in adult body length and mass between islands as a result of energetic limitation. On a given island, foraging efficiency (intake/bite) explained the negative energy balance of large compared to small iguanas. This also explained why, on both islands, the largest animals suffered higher mortality rates than did medium-sized ones when food was scarce. The finding that small animals outcompeted larger ones because of their higher foraging efficiency resembles the grazing succession in ungulate herbivores.
Wikelski M, Carrillo V, Trillmich F. Energy limits to body size in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos marine iguana. ECOLOGY. 1997;78(7):2204-2217.
Wikelski, M., Carrillo, V., & Trillmich, F. (1997). Energy limits to body size in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos marine iguana. ECOLOGY, 78(7), 2204-2217. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2204:ELTBSI]2.0.CO;2
Wikelski, M., Carrillo, V., and Trillmich, F. (1997). Energy limits to body size in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos marine iguana. ECOLOGY 78, 2204-2217.
Wikelski, M., Carrillo, V., & Trillmich, F., 1997. Energy limits to body size in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos marine iguana. ECOLOGY, 78(7), p 2204-2217.
M. Wikelski, V. Carrillo, and F. Trillmich, “Energy limits to body size in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos marine iguana”, ECOLOGY, vol. 78, 1997, pp. 2204-2217.
Wikelski, M., Carrillo, V., Trillmich, F.: Energy limits to body size in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos marine iguana. ECOLOGY. 78, 2204-2217 (1997).
Wikelski, M, Carrillo, V, and Trillmich, Fritz. “Energy limits to body size in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos marine iguana”. ECOLOGY 78.7 (1997): 2204-2217.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications: