Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody

Gonsior SM, Platz S, Buchmeier S, Scheer U, Jockusch BM, Hinssen H (1999)
JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE 112(6): 797-809.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ; ; ; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
Using a reconstituted complex: of profilin and skeletal muscle actin as an antigen, we generated a monoclonal mouse antibody against actin, termed 2G2, As revealed by immunoblots of proteolytic actin fragments and by pepscan analysis, the antibody recognises a nonsequential epitope on actin which is located within three different regions of the sequence, consisting of aa131-139, aa155-169, and aa176-187, In the actin model derived from X-ray diffraction, these sequences lie spatially close together in the region of the nucleotide-binding cleft, but do not form a coherent patch. In immunoblots, 2G2 reacts with all SDS-denatured actin isoforms and with actins of many vertebrates. In contrast, its immunofluorescence reactivity is highly selective and fixation-dependent, In fibroblasts and myogenic cells, fixed and extracted by formaldehyde/detergent, stress fibres or myofibrils, respectively, remained unstained. Likewise, after microinjection into living cells, 2G2 did not bind to such microfilament bundles. Extraction of myosin and tropomyosin did not alter this pattern indicating that the lack in reactivity is probably not due to epitope-masking by actin-binding proteins, More likely, the reason for the lack of reactivity with filamentous actin is that its epitope is not accessible in F-actin, However, the antibody revealed a distinct pattern of nuclear dots in differentiated myogenic cells but not in myoblasts, and of fibrillar structures in nuclei of Xenopus oocytes, In contrast, after methanol treatment, a 2G2-specific staining of stress fibres and myofibrils was observed, but no nuclear dot staining. We conclude that 2G2, in addition to binding to SDS- and methanol-denatured actin, recognises a specific conformation of native actin which is present in the nucleus and specified by compaction of the antibody-reactive region into a coherent patch. This conformation is apparently present in differentiated myogenic cells and oocytes, but not in cytoplasmic actin filament bundles.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Band
112
Zeitschriftennummer
6
Seite
797-809
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Gonsior SM, Platz S, Buchmeier S, Scheer U, Jockusch BM, Hinssen H. Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE. 1999;112(6):797-809.
Gonsior, S. M., Platz, S., Buchmeier, S., Scheer, U., Jockusch, B. M., & Hinssen, H. (1999). Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 112(6), 797-809.
Gonsior, S. M., Platz, S., Buchmeier, S., Scheer, U., Jockusch, B. M., and Hinssen, H. (1999). Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE 112, 797-809.
Gonsior, S.M., et al., 1999. Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 112(6), p 797-809.
S.M. Gonsior, et al., “Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody”, JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, vol. 112, 1999, pp. 797-809.
Gonsior, S.M., Platz, S., Buchmeier, S., Scheer, U., Jockusch, B.M., Hinssen, H.: Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE. 112, 797-809 (1999).
Gonsior, SM, Platz, S, Buchmeier, S, Scheer, U, Jockusch, BM, and Hinssen, Horst. “Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody”. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE 112.6 (1999): 797-809.

71 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

New roles for lamins, nuclear envelope proteins and actin in the nucleus.
Maraldi NM, Lattanzi G, Marmiroli S, Squarzoni S, Manzoli FA., Adv Enzyme Regul 44(), 2004
PMID: 15581488
Intracellular topology and epitope shielding of poliovirus 3A protein.
Choe SS, Kirkegaard K., J Virol 78(11), 2004
PMID: 15140995
Epitope-dependent localization of estrogen receptor-alpha, but not -beta, in en face arterial endothelium.
Dan P, Cheung JC, Scriven DR, Moore ED., Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284(4), 2003
PMID: 12531733
At the nucleus of the problem: nuclear proteins and disease.
Maraldi NM, Lattanzi G, Squarzoni S, Sabatelli P, Marmiroli S, Ognibene A, Manzoli FA., Adv Enzyme Regul 43(), 2003
PMID: 12791400
Association of emerin with nuclear and cytoplasmic actin is regulated in differentiating myoblasts.
Lattanzi G, Cenni V, Marmiroli S, Capanni C, Mattioli E, Merlini L, Squarzoni S, Maraldi NM., Biochem Biophys Res Commun 303(3), 2003
PMID: 12670476
Actin-filled nuclear invaginations indicate degree of cell de-differentiation.
Johnson N, Krebs M, Boudreau R, Giorgi G, LeGros M, Larabell C., Differentiation 71(7), 2003
PMID: 12969334
Nuclear actin and protein 4.1: essential interactions during nuclear assembly in vitro.
Krauss SW, Chen C, Penman S, Heald R., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(19), 2003
PMID: 12960380
Nuclear actin and actin-related proteins in chromatin remodeling.
Olave IA, Reck-Peterson SL, Crabtree GR., Annu Rev Biochem 71(), 2002
PMID: 12045110
Actin's propensity for dynamic filament patterning.
Schoenenberger CA, Bischler N, Fahrenkrog B, Aebi U., FEBS Lett 529(1), 2002
PMID: 12354608
The vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein promotes actin polymerisation through direct binding to monomeric actin.
Walders-Harbeck B, Khaitlina SY, Hinssen H, Jockusch BM, Illenberger S., FEBS Lett 529(2-3), 2002
PMID: 12372613
Actin in the nucleus: what form and what for?
Pederson T, Aebi U., J Struct Biol 140(1-3), 2002
PMID: 12490148
Cofactor requirements for nuclear export of Rev response element (RRE)- and constitutive transport element (CTE)-containing retroviral RNAs. An unexpected role for actin.
Hofmann W, Reichart B, Ewald A, Müller E, Schmitt I, Stauber RH, Lottspeich F, Jockusch BM, Scheer U, Hauber J, Dabauvalle MC., J Cell Biol 152(5), 2001
PMID: 11238447
Differentiation- and stress-dependent nuclear cytoplasmic redistribution of myopodin, a novel actin-bundling protein.
Weins A, Schwarz K, Faul C, Barisoni L, Linke WA, Mundel P., J Cell Biol 155(3), 2001
PMID: 11673475
F-actin is a component of the karyosome in neuropteran oocyte nuclei.
Rubsam R, Buning J., Arthropod structure & development. 30(2), 2001
PMID: IND23249623
Raver1, a dual compartment protein, is a ligand for PTB/hnRNPI and microfilament attachment proteins.
Hüttelmaier S, Illenberger S, Grosheva I, Rüdiger M, Singer RH, Jockusch BM., J Cell Biol 155(5), 2001
PMID: 11724819
Somatic lamins in germinal vesicles of goldfish (Carassius auratus) vitellogenic oocytes.
Yamaguchi A, Nagahama Y., Cell Struct Funct 26(6), 2001
PMID: 11942628
Half a century of "the nuclear matrix".
Pederson T., Mol Biol Cell 11(3), 2000
PMID: 10712500
Actin cytoskeleton in plants: from transport networks to signaling networks.
Volkmann D, Baluska F., Microsc Res Tech 47(2), 1999
PMID: 10523792

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 10036230
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar