On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples

Piedmont RL, McCrae RR, Riemann R, Angleitner A (2000)
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 78(3): 582-593.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
Because of the potential for bias and error in questionnaire responding, many personality inventories include validity scales intended to correct biased scores or identify invalid protocols. The authors evaluated the utility of several types of validity scales in a volunteer sample of 72 men and 106 women who completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; P. T. Costa Be R. R. McCrae, 1992) and the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ; A. Tellegen, 1978/1982) and were rated by 2 acquaintances on the observer form of the NEO-PI-R. Analyses indicated that the validity indexes lacked utility in this sample. A partial replication (N = 1,728) also failed to find consistent support for the use of validity scales. The authors illustrate the use of informant ratings in assessing protocol validity and argue that psychological assessors should limit their use of validity scales and seek instead to improve the quality of personality assessments.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Band
78
Zeitschriftennummer
3
Seite
582-593
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Piedmont RL, McCrae RR, Riemann R, Angleitner A. On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2000;78(3):582-593.
Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 78(3), 582-593. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.582
Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., Riemann, R., and Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 78, 582-593.
Piedmont, R.L., et al., 2000. On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 78(3), p 582-593.
R.L. Piedmont, et al., “On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples”, JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 78, 2000, pp. 582-593.
Piedmont, R.L., McCrae, R.R., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A.: On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 78, 582-593 (2000).
Piedmont, RL, McCrae, RR, Riemann, Rainer, and Angleitner, Alois. “On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples”. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 78.3 (2000): 582-593.

47 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Personality traits in Sardinia: testing founder population effects on trait means and variances.
Costa PT, Terracciano A, Uda M, Vacca L, Mameli C, Pilia G, Zonderman AB, Lakatta E, Schlessinger D, McCrae RR., Behav Genet 37(2), 2007
PMID: 16972192
Temperament and developmental psychopathology.
Nigg JT., J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47(3-4), 2006
PMID: 16492265
Psychiatric patient and informant reports of patient behavior.
Ready RE, Clark LA., J Pers 73(1), 2005
PMID: 15660671
Personality stability in late adulthood: a behavioral genetic analysis.
Johnson W, McGue M, Krueger RF., J Pers 73(2), 2005
PMID: 15745440
Assessment of adult psychopathology: meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations.
Achenbach TM, Krukowski RA, Dumenci L, Ivanova MY., Psychol Bull 131(3), 2005
PMID: 15869333
Personality dimensions across cultures.
Allik J., J Pers Disord 19(3), 2005
PMID: 16175734
Conceptual complexity and construct validity.
McGrath RE., J Pers Assess 85(2), 2005
PMID: 16171410
Response styles in affect ratings: making a mountain out of a molehill.
Schimmack U, Böckenholt U, Reisenzein R., J Pers Assess 78(3), 2002
PMID: 12146815
Elisions in the field of caring.
Deary V, Deary IJ, McKenna HP, McCance TV, Watson R, Hoogbruin AL., J Adv Nurs 39(1), 2002
PMID: 12074756
Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales.
Morey LC, Quigley BD, Sanislow CA, Skodol AE, McGlashan TH, Shea MT, Stout RL, Zanarini MC, Gunderson JG., J Pers Assess 79(3), 2002
PMID: 12511022
Effectiveness of NEO-PI-R research validity scales for discriminating analog malingering and genuine psychopathology.
Berry DT, Bagby RM, Smerz J, Rinaldo JC, Caldwell-Andrews A, Baer RA., J Pers Assess 76(3), 2001
PMID: 11499461

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 10743882
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar