Structural and functional variability within the canopy and its relevance for carbon gain and stress avoidance

Werner C, Ryel RJ, Correia O, Beyschlag W (2001)
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY 22(2): 129-138.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
Abstract / Bemerkung
The functional variability in leaf angle distribution within the canopy was analysed with respect to regulation of light interception and photoprotection. Leaf orientation strongly determined the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F-v/F-m) during summer: horizontal leaves were highly photoinhibited whereas vertical leaf orientation protected the leaves from severe photoinhibition. The importance of leaf orientation within the canopy was analysed in two Mediterranean macchia species with distinct strategies for drought and photoinhibition avoidance during summer. The semi-deciduous species (Cistus monspeliensis) exhibited strong seasonal but minimal spatial variability in leaf orientation. Reversible structural regulation of light interception by vertical leaf orientation during summer protected the leaves from severe photoinhibition. The evergreen sclerophyll (Quercus coccifera) exhibited high spatial variability in leaf angle distribution throughout the year and was less susceptible to photoinhibition. The importance of both strategies for plant primary production was analysed with a three-dimensional canopy photoinhibition model (CANO-PI). Simulations indicated that high variability in leaf angle orientation in Q. coccifera resulted in whole-plant carbon gain during the summer, which was 94 % of the maximum rate achieved by theoretical homogeneous leaf orientations. The high spatial variability in leaf angle orientation may be an effective compromise between efficient light harvesting and avoidance of excessive radiation in evergreen plants and may optimize annual primary production. Whole plant photosynthesis was strongly reduced by water stress and photoinhibition in C. monspeliensis; however, the simulations indicated that growth-related structural regulation of light interception served as an important protection against photoinhibitory reduction in whole-plant carbon gain. (C) 2001 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
Band
22
Zeitschriftennummer
2
Seite
129-138
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Werner C, Ryel RJ, Correia O, Beyschlag W. Structural and functional variability within the canopy and its relevance for carbon gain and stress avoidance. ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY. 2001;22(2):129-138.
Werner, C., Ryel, R. J., Correia, O., & Beyschlag, W. (2001). Structural and functional variability within the canopy and its relevance for carbon gain and stress avoidance. ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 22(2), 129-138. doi:10.1016/S1146-609X(01)01106-7
Werner, C., Ryel, R. J., Correia, O., and Beyschlag, W. (2001). Structural and functional variability within the canopy and its relevance for carbon gain and stress avoidance. ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY 22, 129-138.
Werner, C., et al., 2001. Structural and functional variability within the canopy and its relevance for carbon gain and stress avoidance. ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 22(2), p 129-138.
C. Werner, et al., “Structural and functional variability within the canopy and its relevance for carbon gain and stress avoidance”, ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, vol. 22, 2001, pp. 129-138.
Werner, C., Ryel, R.J., Correia, O., Beyschlag, W.: Structural and functional variability within the canopy and its relevance for carbon gain and stress avoidance. ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY. 22, 129-138 (2001).
Werner, Christiane, Ryel, RJ, Correia, O, and Beyschlag, Wolfram. “Structural and functional variability within the canopy and its relevance for carbon gain and stress avoidance”. ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY 22.2 (2001): 129-138.