Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity - Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations

Chiroro P, Bohner G, Viki GT, Jarvis CI (2004)
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE 19(4): 427-442.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
Individuals who are high in rape myth acceptance (RMA) have been found to report a high proclivity to rape. In a series of three studies, the authors examined whether the relationship between RMA and self-reported rape proclivity was mediated by anticipated sexual arousal or anticipated enjoyment of sexually dominating the rape victim. Results of all three studies suggest that the anticipated enjoyment of sexual dominance mediates the relationship between RMA and rape proclivity, whereas anticipated sexual arousal does not. These findings are consistent with the feminist argument that rape and sexual violence may be motivated by men's desire to exert power over women. Theoretical and practical implications of our findings are discussed.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE
Band
19
Zeitschriftennummer
4
Seite
427-442
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Chiroro P, Bohner G, Viki GT, Jarvis CI. Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity - Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE. 2004;19(4):427-442.
Chiroro, P., Bohner, G., Viki, G. T., & Jarvis, C. I. (2004). Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity - Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 19(4), 427-442. doi:10.1177/0886260503262081
Chiroro, P., Bohner, G., Viki, G. T., and Jarvis, C. I. (2004). Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity - Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE 19, 427-442.
Chiroro, P., et al., 2004. Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity - Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 19(4), p 427-442.
P. Chiroro, et al., “Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity - Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations”, JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, vol. 19, 2004, pp. 427-442.
Chiroro, P., Bohner, G., Viki, G.T., Jarvis, C.I.: Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity - Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE. 19, 427-442 (2004).
Chiroro, Patrick, Bohner, Gerd, Viki, G. Tendayi, and Jarvis, Christopher I. “Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity - Expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations”. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE 19.4 (2004): 427-442.

15 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Gender-Blind Sexism and Rape Myth Acceptance.
Stoll LC, Lilley TG, Pinter K., Violence Against Women 23(1), 2017
PMID: 26944715
Rape-myth acceptance among students at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Rominski SD, Darteh E, Munro-Kramer M., Int J Gynaecol Obstet 136(2), 2017
PMID: 28099723
Are Child Abusers Sexually Attracted to Submissiveness? Assessment of Sex-Related Cognition With the Implicit Association Test.
Kanters T, Hornsveld RH, Nunes KL, Huijding J, Zwets AJ, Snowden RJ, Muris P, van Marle HJ., Sex Abuse 28(5), 2016
PMID: 25079778
The Role of Institutional Factors on On-Campus Reported Rape Prevalence.
Stotzer RL, MacCartney D., J Interpers Violence 31(16), 2016
PMID: 25900911
Rape myth attitudes in rural Kenya: toward the development of a culturally relevant attitude scale and "blame index".
Tavrow P, Withers M, Obbuyi A, Omollo V, Wu E., J Interpers Violence 28(10), 2013
PMID: 23300194
Effect of sex offenders treatment program on cognitive and emotional characteristics of mentally ill sex offenders.
Kim JH, Choi SS, Rhee MS, Kim SB, Joung JS, Kim EH., J Forensic Sci 57(6), 2012
PMID: 22804231
Sexual violence prevention: the role of stages of change.
Banyard VL, Eckstein RP, Moynihan MM., J Interpers Violence 25(1), 2010
PMID: 19252067
Oppression through acceptance?: predicting rape myth acceptance and attitudes toward rape victims.
Hockett JM, Saucier DA, Hoffman BH, Smith SJ, Craig AW., Violence Against Women 15(8), 2009
PMID: 19506093
Rape Myth Scale: factor structure and relationship with gender egalitarianism among Japanese professionals.
Uji M, Shono M, Shikai N, Kitamura T., Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 61(4), 2007
PMID: 17610664
Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men.
Santana MC, Raj A, Decker MR, La Marche A, Silverman JG., J Urban Health 83(4), 2006
PMID: 16845496
Hostile sexism, type of rape, and self-reported rape proclivity within a sample of Zimbabwean males.
Viki GT, Chiroro P, Abrams D., Violence Against Women 12(8), 2006
PMID: 16861333

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 15038883
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar