Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences

Horstmann G, Borgstedt K, Heumann M (2006)
EMOTION 6(1): 28-39.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
Do threatening or negative faces capture attention? The authors argue that evidence from visual search, spatial cuing. and flanker tasks is equivocal and that perceptual differences may account for effects attributed to emotional categories. Empirically, the authors examine the flanker task. Although they replicate previous results in which a positive face flanked by negative faces suffers more interference than a negative face flanked by positive faces, further results indicate that face perception is not necessary for the flanker-effect asymmetry and that the asymmetry also occurs with nonemotional stimuli. The authors conclude that the flanker-effect asymmetry with affective faces cannot be unambiguously attributed to emotional differences and may well be due to purely perceptual differences between the stimuli.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
EMOTION
Band
6
Zeitschriftennummer
1
Seite
28-39
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Horstmann G, Borgstedt K, Heumann M. Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences. EMOTION. 2006;6(1):28-39.
Horstmann, G., Borgstedt, K., & Heumann, M. (2006). Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences. EMOTION, 6(1), 28-39. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.28
Horstmann, G., Borgstedt, K., and Heumann, M. (2006). Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences. EMOTION 6, 28-39.
Horstmann, G., Borgstedt, K., & Heumann, M., 2006. Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences. EMOTION, 6(1), p 28-39.
G. Horstmann, K. Borgstedt, and M. Heumann, “Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences”, EMOTION, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 28-39.
Horstmann, G., Borgstedt, K., Heumann, M.: Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences. EMOTION. 6, 28-39 (2006).
Horstmann, Gernot, Borgstedt, K, and Heumann, M. “Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences”. EMOTION 6.1 (2006): 28-39.

32 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Attentional bias during emotional processing: evidence from an emotional flanker task using IAPS.
Parra MA, Sánchez MG, Valencia S, Trujillo N., Cogn Emot 32(2), 2018
PMID: 28288533
Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and Arrow.
Fan L, Yu H, Zhang X, Feng Q, Sun M, Xu M., Iperception 9(3), 2018
PMID: 29770186
Direct Electrophysiological Mapping of Shape-Induced Affective Perception.
Li Y, Ding Q, Zhao Y, Bu Y, Tang X, Wang P, Zhang G, Chen M, Liang P., Neural Plast 2018(), 2018
PMID: 30174687
Updating schematic emotional facial expressions in working memory: Response bias and sensitivity.
Tamm G, Kreegipuu K, Harro J, Cowan N., Acta Psychol (Amst) 172(), 2017
PMID: 27835749
An Explanation for the Role of the Amygdala in Aesthetic Judgments.
Jacobs RH, Cornelissen FW., Front Hum Neurosci 11(), 2017
PMID: 28303095
Too Tasty to Be Ignored.
Dummel S, Hübner R., Exp Psychol 64(5), 2017
PMID: 29173141
The time course of attentional modulation on emotional conflict processing.
Zhou P, Yang G, Nan W, Liu X., Cogn Emot 30(4), 2016
PMID: 25809920
Do emotions or gender drive our actions? A study of motor distractibility.
Ambron E, Rumiati RI, Foroni F., Cogn Neurosci 7(1-4), 2016
PMID: 26418348
Pick on someone your own size: the detection of threatening facial expressions posed by both child and adult models.
LoBue V, Matthews K, Harvey T, Thrasher C., J Exp Child Psychol 118(), 2014
PMID: 24070707
Ignoring real faces: effects of valence, threat, and salience.
Blagrove E, Watson DG., Atten Percept Psychophys 76(3), 2014
PMID: 24435898
Threatening shapes: the impact of simple geometric configurations on peripheral physiological markers.
Armbruster D, Suchert V, Gärtner A, Strobel A., Physiol Behav 135(), 2014
PMID: 24976454
Anger superiority effect for change detection and change blindness.
Lyyra P, Hietanen JK, Astikainen P., Conscious Cogn 30(), 2014
PMID: 25129035
Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review.
Carretié L., Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 14(4), 2014
PMID: 24683062
The effect of facial expression and gaze direction on memory for unfamiliar faces.
Nakashima SF, Langton SR, Yoshikawa S., Cogn Emot 26(7), 2012
PMID: 22077759
A flanker effect for moving visual stimuli.
Lange-Malecki B, Treue S., Vision Res 62(), 2012
PMID: 22811985
The amygdala, top-down effects, and selective attention to features.
Jacobs RH, Renken R, Aleman A, Cornelissen FW., Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36(9), 2012
PMID: 22728112
The influence of flankers on race categorization of faces.
Sun HM, Balas B., Atten Percept Psychophys 74(8), 2012
PMID: 22825930
A Potential Role for a Genetic Variation of AKAP5 in Human Aggression and Anger Control.
Richter S, Gorny X, Marco-Pallares J, Krämer UM, Machts J, Barman A, Bernstein HG, Schüle R, Schöls L, Rodriguez-Fornells A, Reissner C, Wüstenberg T, Heinze HJ, Gundelfinger ED, Düzel E, Münte TF, Seidenbecher CI, Schott BH., Front Hum Neurosci 5(), 2011
PMID: 22232585
Identification of angry faces in the attentional blink.
Maratos FA, Mogg K, Bradley BP., Cogn Emot 22(7), 2008
PMID: 19360116
More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.
Horstmann G, Scharlau I, Ansorge U., Psychon Bull Rev 13(6), 2006
PMID: 17484437

56 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition.
bargh, 1989
Orientation asymmetry in the flanker task.
Cohen A, Shoup RE., Percept Psychophys 53(6), 1993
PMID: 8332435
Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion.
Eastwood JD, Smilek D, Merikle PM., Percept Psychophys 63(6), 2001
PMID: 11578045
Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance.
Eastwood JD, Smilek D, Merikle PM., Percept Psychophys 65(3), 2003
PMID: 12785065

eco, 1988
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.
eriksen, perception & psychophysics 16(), 1974
Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.
Folk CL, Leber AB, Egeth HE., Percept Psychophys 64(5), 2002
PMID: 12201333
Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement.
jonides, 1981
Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.
Jonides J, Yantis S., Percept Psychophys 43(4), 1988
PMID: 3362663
On the perception of shape from shading.
Kleffner DA, Ramachandran VS., Percept Psychophys 52(1), 1992
PMID: 1635855
Curvature discontinuities are cues for rapid shape analysis.
Kristjansson A, Tse PU., Percept Psychophys 63(3), 2001
PMID: 11414128
Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness.
mogg, cognition and emotion 19(), 1999

selz, 1922
Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.
Franconeri SL, Simons DJ., Percept Psychophys 65(7), 2003
PMID: 14674628
Perceptual selectivity for color and form.
Theeuwes J., Percept Psychophys 51(6), 1992
PMID: 1620571
Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering.
Treisman A, Kahneman D, Burkell J., Percept Psychophys 33(6), 1983
PMID: 6622188
The effect of an unexpected heterogeneity on attention.
wilcocks, the journal of general psychology 1(), 1928
Visual search
wolfe, 1998
Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction.
Wolfe JM., Percept Psychophys 63(3), 2001
PMID: 11414127
Animal Signals: Models and Terminology
Smith, Journal of Theoretical Biology 177(3), 1995
The Face of Wrath: Critical Features for Conveying Facial Threat
Lundqvist,, Cognition & Emotion 13(6), 1999
Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?
Fox E, Lester V, Russo R, Bowles RJ, Pichler A, Dutton K., Cogn Emot 14(1), 2000
PMID: 17401453
A search asymmetry reversed by figure-ground assignment.
Humphreys GW, Muller H., Psychol Sci 11(3), 2000
PMID: 11273403
When something old becomes something new: spatiotemporal object continuity and attentional capture.
Rauschenberger R., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29(3), 2003
PMID: 12848328
Contour grouping inside and outside of facial contexts.
Pomerantz JR, Agrawal A, Jewell SW, Jeong M, Khan H, Lozano SC., Acta Psychol (Amst) 114(3), 2003
PMID: 14670700
The face of wrath: The role of features and configurations in conveying social threat
Lundqvist, Cognition & Emotion 18(2), 2004
Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.
Treisman A, Souther J., J Exp Psychol Gen 114(3), 1985
PMID: 3161978
Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.
Treisman A, Gormican S., Psychol Rev 95(1), 1988
PMID: 3353475
The recognition of threatening facial stimuli.
Aronoff J, Barclay AM, Stevenson LA., J Pers Soc Psychol 54(4), 1988
PMID: 3367283
Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect.
Hansen CH, Hansen RD., J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6), 1988
PMID: 3397866
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(4), 1992
PMID: 1431742
Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects.
Yantis S, Hillstrom AP., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20(1), 1994
PMID: 8133227
Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.
Yantis S., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19(3), 1993
PMID: 8331320
Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.
Lavie N., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21(3), 1995
PMID: 7790827
Surprise and schema strength.
Schützwohl, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition 24(5), 1998
Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
Theeuwes J, Burger R., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24(5), 1998
PMID: 9778827
On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.
Yantis S, Egeth HE., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(3), 1999
PMID: 10385983
New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority.
Enns JT, Austen EL, Lollo VD, Rauschenberger R, Yantis S., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(6), 2001
PMID: 11766925
Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?
Fox E, Russo R, Bowles R, Dutton K., J Exp Psychol Gen 130(4), 2001
PMID: 11757875
The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.
Ohman A, Lundqvist D, Esteves F., J Pers Soc Psychol 80(3), 2001
PMID: 11300573
The eyebrow frown: a salient social signal.
Tipples J, Atkinson AP, Young AW., Emotion 2(3), 2002
PMID: 12899361
Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy.
Horstmann G., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31(5), 2005
PMID: 16262497
Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.
Yantis S, Jonides J., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10(5), 1984
PMID: 6238122
Influence of scene-based properties on visual search.
Enns JT, Rensink RA., Science 247(4943), 1990
PMID: 2300824
Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.
Thompson P., Perception 9(4), 1980
PMID: 6999452
Faces and facial expressions do not pop out.
Nothdurft HC., Perception 22(11), 1993
PMID: 8047415
It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd.
Purcell DG, Stewart AL, Skov RB., Perception 25(9), 1996
PMID: 8983049
An experimental analysis of surprise
Meyer, Cognition & Emotion 5(4), 1991
Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion
White, Cognition & Emotion 9(5), 1995

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 16637748
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar