Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect

Horstmann G, Bauland A (2006)
EMOTION 6(2): 193-207.

Download
No fulltext has been uploaded. References only!
Journal Article | Original Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author
;
Abstract
The anger-superiority hypothesis states that angry faces are detected more efficiently than friendly faces. ecological validity. The authors argue that a confounding of appearance and meaning is unavoidable and even Unproblematic if real faces are presented. Four experiments tested carefully controlled photos in a search-asymmetry design. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed more efficient detection of an angry face among happy faces than vice versa. Experiment 3 indicated that the advantage was line to the mouth. but not to the eyes. and Experiment 4. using, upright and inverted thatcherized faces. suggests a perceptual basis. The results are in line with a sensory-bias hypothesis that facial expressions evolved to exploit extant capabilities of the Visual system.
Publishing Year
ISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Horstmann G, Bauland A. Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION. 2006;6(2):193-207.
Horstmann, G., & Bauland, A. (2006). Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION, 6(2), 193-207. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.193
Horstmann, G., and Bauland, A. (2006). Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION 6, 193-207.
Horstmann, G., & Bauland, A., 2006. Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION, 6(2), p 193-207.
G. Horstmann and A. Bauland, “Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect”, EMOTION, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 193-207.
Horstmann, G., Bauland, A.: Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION. 6, 193-207 (2006).
Horstmann, Gernot, and Bauland, Andrea. “Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect”. EMOTION 6.2 (2006): 193-207.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

67 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T, Schmidt-Daffy M, Schubö A., Psychophysiology 48(5), 2011
PMID: 20883506
Evidence for a general face salience signal in human amygdala.
Santos A, Mier D, Kirsch P, Meyer-Lindenberg A., Neuroimage 54(4), 2011
PMID: 21081170
Face value: eye movements and the evaluation of facial crowds in social anxiety.
Lange WG, Heuer K, Langner O, Keijsers GP, Becker ES, Rinck M., J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 42(3), 2011
PMID: 21419092
Visual search for schematic emotional faces risks perceptual confound.
Mak-Fan KM, Thompson WF, Green RE., Cogn Emot 25(4), 2011
PMID: 21547761
Mandatory processing of irrelevant fearful face features in visual search.
Fenker DB, Heipertz D, Boehler CN, Schoenfeld MA, Noesselt T, Heinze HJ, Duezel E, Hopf JM., J Cogn Neurosci 22(12), 2010
PMID: 19702468
A threat-detection advantage in those with autism spectrum disorders.
Krysko KM, Rutherford MD., Brain Cogn 69(3), 2009
PMID: 19036491
Recognition of emotional expressions is affected by inversion and presentation time.
Derntl B, Seidel EM, Kainz E, Carbon CC., Perception 38(12), 2009
PMID: 20192133
Recognizing threat: a simple geometric shape activates neural circuitry for threat detection.
Larson CL, Aronoff J, Sarinopoulos IC, Zhu DC., J Cogn Neurosci 21(8), 2009
PMID: 18823242
Visual search of emotional faces. Eye-movement assessment of component processes.
Calvo MG, Nummenmaa L, Avero P., Exp Psychol 55(6), 2008
PMID: 19130762
Electrophysiological correlates of spatial orienting towards angry faces: a source localization study.
Santesso DL, Meuret AE, Hofmann SG, Mueller EM, Ratner KG, Roesch EB, Pizzagalli DA., Neuropsychologia 46(5), 2008
PMID: 18249424
Fear, faces, and the human amygdala.
Adolphs R., Curr Opin Neurobiol 18(2), 2008
PMID: 18655833
More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.
Horstmann G, Scharlau I, Ansorge U., Psychon Bull Rev 13(6), 2006
PMID: 17484437

37 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.
Treisman A, Gormican S., Psychol Rev 95(1), 1988
PMID: 3353475
The recognition of threatening facial stimuli.
Aronoff J, Barclay AM, Stevenson LA., J Pers Soc Psychol 54(4), 1988
PMID: 3367283
Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect.
Hansen CH, Hansen RD., J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6), 1988
PMID: 3397866
Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect.
Suzuki, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 21(4), 1995
The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.
Ohman A, Lundqvist D, Esteves F., J Pers Soc Psychol 80(3), 2001
PMID: 11300573
The eyebrow frown: a salient social signal.
Tipples J, Atkinson AP, Young AW., Emotion 2(3), 2002
PMID: 12899361
Looking at upide-down faces.
Yin, Journal of Experimental Psychology 81(1), 1969
Influence of scene-based properties on visual search.
Enns JT, Rensink RA., Science 247(4943), 1990
PMID: 2300824
Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.
Thompson P., Perception 9(4), 1980
PMID: 6999452
Faces and facial expressions do not pop out.
Nothdurft HC., Perception 22(11), 1993
PMID: 8047415
It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd.
Purcell DG, Stewart AL, Skov RB., Perception 25(9), 1996
PMID: 8983049
Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion
White, Cognition & Emotion 9(5), 1995

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 16768552
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar