Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect

Horstmann G, Bauland A (2006)
EMOTION 6(2): 193-207.

Journal Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author
;
Abstract
The anger-superiority hypothesis states that angry faces are detected more efficiently than friendly faces. ecological validity. The authors argue that a confounding of appearance and meaning is unavoidable and even Unproblematic if real faces are presented. Four experiments tested carefully controlled photos in a search-asymmetry design. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed more efficient detection of an angry face among happy faces than vice versa. Experiment 3 indicated that the advantage was line to the mouth. but not to the eyes. and Experiment 4. using, upright and inverted thatcherized faces. suggests a perceptual basis. The results are in line with a sensory-bias hypothesis that facial expressions evolved to exploit extant capabilities of the Visual system.
Publishing Year
ISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Horstmann G, Bauland A. Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION. 2006;6(2):193-207.
Horstmann, G., & Bauland, A. (2006). Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION, 6(2), 193-207.
Horstmann, G., and Bauland, A. (2006). Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION 6, 193-207.
Horstmann, G., & Bauland, A., 2006. Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION, 6(2), p 193-207.
G. Horstmann and A. Bauland, “Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect”, EMOTION, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 193-207.
Horstmann, G., Bauland, A.: Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. EMOTION. 6, 193-207 (2006).
Horstmann, Gernot, and Bauland, Andrea. “Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect”. EMOTION 6.2 (2006): 193-207.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

48 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

BDNF Val(66)Met and 5-HTTLPR Genotype are Each Associated with Visual Scanning Patterns of Faces in Young Children.
Christou AI, Wallis Y, Bair H, Crawford H, Frisson S, Zeegers MP, McCleery JP., Front Behav Neurosci 9(), 2015
PMID: 26217202
Sex differences in perception of invisible facial expressions.
Hong SW, Yoon KL, Peaco S., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 25883583
Attachment style impacts behavior and early oculomotor response to positive, but not negative, pictures.
Silva C, Chaminade T, David da F, Santos A, Esteves F, Soares I, Deruelle C., Scand J Psychol 56(3), 2015
PMID: 25693911
Facial expression influences face identity recognition during the attentional blink.
Bach DR, Schmidt-Daffy M, Dolan RJ., Emotion 14(6), 2014
PMID: 25286076
Inter-trial priming does not affect attentional priority in asymmetric visual search.
Amunts L, Yashar A, Lamy D., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25221536
Orienting and maintenance of attention to threatening facial expressions in anxiety--an eye movement study.
Holas P, Krejtz I, Cypryanska M, Nezlek JB., Psychiatry Res 220(1-2), 2014
PMID: 25107319
Threatening shapes: the impact of simple geometric configurations on peripheral physiological markers.
Armbruster D, Suchert V, Gartner A, Strobel A., Physiol. Behav. 135(), 2014
PMID: 24976454
Visual search efficiency is greater for human faces compared to animal faces.
Simpson EA, Husband HL, Yee K, Fullerton A, Jakobsen KV., Exp Psychol 61(6), 2014
PMID: 24962122
Eye tracking the face in the crowd task: why are angry faces found more quickly?
Shasteen JR, Sasson NJ, Pinkham AE., PLoS ONE 9(4), 2014
PMID: 24699880
The influence of working memory on the anger superiority effect.
Moriya J, Koster EH, De Raedt R., Cogn Emot 28(8), 2014
PMID: 24564850
Ignoring real faces: effects of valence, threat, and salience.
Blagrove E, Watson DG., Atten Percept Psychophys 76(3), 2014
PMID: 24435898
Explicit recognition of emotional facial expressions is shaped by expertise: evidence from professional actors.
Conson M, Ponari M, Monteforte E, Ricciato G, Sara M, Grossi D, Trojano L., Front Psychol 4(), 2013
PMID: 23825467
No prior entry for threat-related faces: evidence from temporal order judgments.
Schettino A, Loeys T, Pourtois G., PLoS ONE 8(4), 2013
PMID: 23646126

37 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.
Treisman A, Gormican S., Psychol Rev 95(1), 1988
PMID: 3353475
The recognition of threatening facial stimuli.
Aronoff J, Barclay AM, Stevenson LA., J Pers Soc Psychol 54(4), 1988
PMID: 3367283
Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect.
Hansen CH, Hansen RD., J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6), 1988
PMID: 3397866
Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect.
Suzuki, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 21(4), 1995
The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.
Ohman A, Lundqvist D, Esteves F., J Pers Soc Psychol 80(3), 2001
PMID: 11300573
The eyebrow frown: a salient social signal.
Tipples J, Atkinson AP, Young AW., Emotion 2(3), 2002
PMID: 12899361
Looking at upide-down faces.
Yin, Journal of Experimental Psychology 81(1), 1969
Influence of scene-based properties on visual search.
Enns JT, Rensink RA., Science 247(4943), 1990
PMID: 2300824
Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.
Thompson P., Perception 9(4), 1980
PMID: 6999452
Faces and facial expressions do not pop out.
Nothdurft HC., Perception 22(11), 1993
PMID: 8047415
It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd.
Purcell DG, Stewart AL, Skov RB., Perception 25(9), 1996
PMID: 8983049
Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion
White, Cognition & Emotion 9(5), 1995

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 16768552
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar