Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag?

Dimitrov D, Haake C-J (2006)
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 89(2): 115-128.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
;
Abstract / Bemerkung
We model the process of coalition formation in the 16th German Bundestag as a hedonic coalition formation game. In order to induce players' preferences in the game we apply the Shapley value of the simple game describing all winning coalitions in the Bundestag. Using different stability notions for hedonic games we prove that the ``most'' stable government is formed by the Union Parties together with the Social Democratic Party.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS
Band
89
Zeitschriftennummer
2
Seite
115-128
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Dimitrov D, Haake C-J. Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS. 2006;89(2):115-128.
Dimitrov, D., & Haake, C. - J. (2006). Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 89(2), 115-128. doi:10.1007/s00712-006-0207-5
Dimitrov, D., and Haake, C. - J. (2006). Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 89, 115-128.
Dimitrov, D., & Haake, C.-J., 2006. Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 89(2), p 115-128.
D. Dimitrov and C.-J. Haake, “Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag?”, JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, vol. 89, 2006, pp. 115-128.
Dimitrov, D., Haake, C.-J.: Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS. 89, 115-128 (2006).
Dimitrov, Dinko, and Haake, Claus-Jochen. “Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag?”. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 89.2 (2006): 115-128.