'In a completely different light'? The role of 'being affected' for the epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people

Schicktanz S, Schweda M, Franzen M (2008)
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11(1): 57-72.

Journal Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author
; ;
Abstract
In this paper, we explore and discuss the use of the concept of being affected in biomedical decision making processes in Germany. The corresponding German term 'Betroffenheit' characterizes on the one hand a relation between a state of affairs and a person and on the other an emotional reaction that involves feelings like concern and empathy with the suffering of others. An example for the increasing relevance of being affected is the postulation of the participation of people with disabilities and chronic or acute diseases in the discourse, as partly realized in the German National Ethics Council or the Federal Joint Committee. Nevertheless, not only on the political level, the resistance against the participation of affected people is still strong; the academic debate seems to be cross-grained, too. Against this background, we explore the meaning and argumentative role of the concept of being affected as it is used by affected and lay people themselves. Our analysis is based on four focus group discussions in which lay people, patients and relatives of patients discuss their attitudes towards biomedical interventions such as organ transplantation and genetic testing. This setting allows for a comparison of how affected and non-affected people are concerned and deliberate about medical opportunities, but also of how they position themselves as being affected or non-affected with respect to (scientific) knowledge and morality. On this basis, we discuss the normative relevance of being affected for the justification of political participation.
Publishing Year
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Schicktanz S, Schweda M, Franzen M. 'In a completely different light'? The role of 'being affected' for the epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2008;11(1):57-72.
Schicktanz, S., Schweda, M., & Franzen, M. (2008). 'In a completely different light'? The role of 'being affected' for the epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 11(1), 57-72.
Schicktanz, S., Schweda, M., and Franzen, M. (2008). 'In a completely different light'? The role of 'being affected' for the epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11, 57-72.
Schicktanz, S., Schweda, M., & Franzen, M., 2008. 'In a completely different light'? The role of 'being affected' for the epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 11(1), p 57-72.
S. Schicktanz, M. Schweda, and M. Franzen, “'In a completely different light'? The role of 'being affected' for the epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, vol. 11, 2008, pp. 57-72.
Schicktanz, S., Schweda, M., Franzen, M.: 'In a completely different light'? The role of 'being affected' for the epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 11, 57-72 (2008).
Schicktanz, Silke, Schweda, Mark, and Franzen, Martina. “'In a completely different light'? The role of 'being affected' for the epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people”. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11.1 (2008): 57-72.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

3 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Client participation in moral case deliberation: a precarious relational balance.
Weidema FC, Abma TA, Widdershoven GA, Molewijk AC., HEC Forum 23(3), 2011
PMID: 21792683

37 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.


AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1995

Scheele, Ethik und Sozialwissenschaft 2(4), 1991

Scully, 2005

Singer, 1979
Social benefit versus technological risk.
Starr C., Science 165(3899), 1969
PMID: 5803536

Strauss, 1990

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Thimm, 1989

Uebersax, 1991

Williams, 1998

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 17619169
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar